Unworking poetic address : a comparative study on Emily Dickinson, Maurice Blanchot, Paul Celan and Jean-Luc Nancy
This thesis studies the element of poetic address in the work of two poets for whom address is a relational element that is connected to an awareness of finitude: Emily Dickinson and Paul Celan. Their poems privilege the idea of sending rather than saying; and focus more on addressing, challenging, and diverting yet calling the reader rather than on building meaning. This relational emphasis is also at the center of a discussion on community and literature held between Maurice Blanchot and Jean-Luc Nancy in the 1980s, which is predominantly studied from political perspectives that regard their concern with the literary as imprecise or secondary. I claim that, in their quest to think of an alternative form of community that is not based on the production of a common essence by its members, the State and institutions, they privilege and revalue literary address. By thinking about literature in the light of dying and finitude, Blanchot and Nancy stress its potential to open up relations with others at the limit of what is common, present, and representable. Their reflections thus provide an illuminating framework to help us understand the notions of address developed by both poets. Moreover, I seek to show that
Ganitsky, Tania
PN0080 Criticism
Unworking poetic address : a comparative study on Emily Dickinson, Maurice Blanchot, Paul Celan and Jean-Luc Nancy. This thesis studies the element of poetic address in the work of two poets for whom address is a relational element that is connected to an awareness of finitude: Emily Dickinson and Paul Celan. Their poems privilege the idea of sending rather than saying; and focus more on addressing, challenging, and diverting yet calling the reader rather than on building meaning. This relational emphasis is also at the center of a discussion on community and literature held between Maurice Blanchot and Jean-Luc Nancy in the 1980s, which is predominantly studied from political perspectives that regard their concern with the literary as imprecise or secondary. I claim that, in their quest to think of an alternative form of community that is not based on the production of a common essence by its members, the State and institutions, they privilege and revalue literary address. By thinking about literature in the light of dying and finitude, Blanchot and Nancy stress its potential to open up relations with others at the limit of what is common, present, and representable. Their reflections thus provide an illuminating framework to help us understand the notions of address developed by both poets. Moreover, I seek to show that
poetic address comparative_study paul jean luc_nancy study element poetic address work poet address relational element connect awareness finitude paul poems privilege idea send rather say focus addressing challenge divert yet call reader rather build meaning relational emphasis also center discussion community literature hold jean luc_nancy predominantly study political perspective regard concern literary imprecise secondary claim quest think alternative form community base production common essence member_state institution privilege literary address think literature light die finitude stress potential open relation_others limit common present reflection thus_provide illuminate framework help notion address develop poet moreover seek_show