Tactical interaction and integration: a study in warfare in the Hellenistic period from Philip II to the Battle of Pydna
In many ways the Hellenistic period has been the poor relation as far as military studies have been'concerned. Even quite comprehensive works on ancient warfare deal with this period in a relatively cursory manner, scholars concentrating on hoplite warfare or Roman military systems to the detriment of the Hellenistic period. To make matters worse, a historiographical tradition exists which places the generals and armies of the period firmly in the shadow of Alexander the Great. Hellenistic warfare has therefore been seen as unimaginative and stereotypical, dominated by armies which used cumbersome and outmoded tactics, and which were led by generals outstanding only in their mediocrity. This thesis is an attempt to redress the balance. I have sought to form a detailed picture of the Hellenistic military machine from the ancient sources and to test modem theories about its operation. The format of the thesis reflects these objectives. As my research progressed it soon became apparent that Hellenistic armies were not the cumbersome devices portrayed in many modem works and that they were composed of a series of interlocking tactical systems that could be viewed on a series of levels, the highest being the army
Nutt, Stephen William
History
Tactical interaction and integration: a study in warfare in the Hellenistic period from Philip II to the Battle of Pydna. In many ways the Hellenistic period has been the poor relation as far as military studies have been'concerned. Even quite comprehensive works on ancient warfare deal with this period in a relatively cursory manner, scholars concentrating on hoplite warfare or Roman military systems to the detriment of the Hellenistic period. To make matters worse, a historiographical tradition exists which places the generals and armies of the period firmly in the shadow of Alexander the Great. Hellenistic warfare has therefore been seen as unimaginative and stereotypical, dominated by armies which used cumbersome and outmoded tactics, and which were led by generals outstanding only in their mediocrity. This thesis is an attempt to redress the balance. I have sought to form a detailed picture of the Hellenistic military machine from the ancient sources and to test modem theories about its operation. The format of the thesis reflects these objectives. As my research progressed it soon became apparent that Hellenistic armies were not the cumbersome devices portrayed in many modem works and that they were composed of a series of interlocking tactical systems that could be viewed on a series of levels, the highest being the army
tactical interaction integration study warfare hellenistic_period battle many_way hellenistic_period poor relation far military study concerned even quite comprehensive work ancient warfare deal period relatively cursory manner scholar concentrate hoplite warfare roman_military system detriment hellenistic_period make matter bad historiographical_tradition exist place general army period firmly shadow alexander_great hellenistic warfare therefore see stereotypical dominated army use cumbersome outmode tactic lead general outstanding attempt redress_balance sought form detailed_picture hellenistic military machine ancient_source test modem theory operation format reflect objective progress soon_become apparent hellenistic army cumbersome device portray many modem work compose series interlock tactical system_could view series level high army