Aristotle on the matter of the elements
This thesis is an investigation into the simplest material entities recognised by Aristotle's theory of nature. In general, the position I defend is that the four 'so-called elements' fire, air, water, and earth are, for Aristotle, genuine elements, i.e., the simplest material constituents, of bodies. In particular, I deal with two problems, the first concerning the relationship between the four 'so-called elements' and the primary contraries, hot-cold, dry-wet; and the second concerning the nature of the matter from which the latter come to be. Responses to these problems in the secondary literature tend to conclude that the contraries (usually together with 'prime matter'), are constitutive of the so-called elements. I reject this conclusion. In the first part of this thesis I consider, and dismiss, the alleged evidence that Aristotle denies to fire, air, water, and earth the status of genuine elements, and I argue that the status of the contraries as the differentiae of the elements effectively rules out the possibility that they could be the constituents of the latter. In the second part of this thesis I attempt to unpack Aristotle's assertion at De Gen. et Cor. II. 1 that the matter of the perceptible
Crowley, Timothy James
Form (Philosophy) ; Four elements (Philosophy) ; Matter ; Philosophy ; Philosophy of nature ; Science, Ancient ; Substance (Philosophy) ; Early works to 1800
Aristotle on the matter of the elements. This thesis is an investigation into the simplest material entities recognised by Aristotle's theory of nature. In general, the position I defend is that the four 'so-called elements' fire, air, water, and earth are, for Aristotle, genuine elements, i.e., the simplest material constituents, of bodies. In particular, I deal with two problems, the first concerning the relationship between the four 'so-called elements' and the primary contraries, hot-cold, dry-wet; and the second concerning the nature of the matter from which the latter come to be. Responses to these problems in the secondary literature tend to conclude that the contraries (usually together with 'prime matter'), are constitutive of the so-called elements. I reject this conclusion. In the first part of this thesis I consider, and dismiss, the alleged evidence that Aristotle denies to fire, air, water, and earth the status of genuine elements, and I argue that the status of the contraries as the differentiae of the elements effectively rules out the possibility that they could be the constituents of the latter. In the second part of this thesis I attempt to unpack Aristotle's assertion at De Gen. et Cor. II. 1 that the matter of the perceptible
aristotle matter element investigation simple material entity recognise aristotle_theory nature general position defend so_called element fire air water earth aristotle genuine element simple material constituent body particular deal problem first concern_relationship so_called element primary contrary hot cold dry wet second concerning nature matter latter come responses problem secondary_literature tend conclude contrary usually together prime matter constitutive so_called element reject conclusion first_part consider dismiss allege evidence aristotle deny fire air water earth status genuine element argue status contrary element effectively rule possibility could latter second_part attempt unpack aristotle assertion gen cor matter perceptible