Jesus the God-Man : the doctrine of the Incarnation in Edward Irving in the light of the teaching of the Church Fathers and its relevance for a twentieth century African context
Irving's doctrine of the incarnation stems from his doctrine of the fall. The fall had detesting effects on human nature. Man's will, reason and understanding became subjected to his bodily desires and the whole of man's nature became corrupt in the sense of always turning towards sin. The enslavement of human nature to sin is such that Irving freely refers to human nature as that sinful stuff; but he does not by this identify sin with the nature itself.At the incarnation, Christ took human nature in 'exactly the same condition in which it is. after the fall. His mainn point here is that there is no difference whatsoever between the humanity of Christ and ours, except our sin; that in order to reconcile usback to God He needed to become exactly what we are. This teaching led to his condemnation as a heretic.However, the same kind of teaching on the true humanity ofChrist can be traced to the Church Fathers. Both Irenaeue and Athanasius emphasized the. true humanity of Christ as.Irving does. Although they. do not use the exact terminology of ~fallen human nature~,their teaching is easentislly the same. Gregory of Nyasa is the clearest in this teaching with the exact terminology that Christ assumed fallen human
Nantomah, Jacob Jamani
Incarnation
Jesus the God-Man : the doctrine of the Incarnation in Edward Irving in the light of the teaching of the Church Fathers and its relevance for a twentieth century African context. Irving's doctrine of the incarnation stems from his doctrine of the fall. The fall had detesting effects on human nature. Man's will, reason and understanding became subjected to his bodily desires and the whole of man's nature became corrupt in the sense of always turning towards sin. The enslavement of human nature to sin is such that Irving freely refers to human nature as that sinful stuff; but he does not by this identify sin with the nature itself.At the incarnation, Christ took human nature in 'exactly the same condition in which it is. after the fall. His mainn point here is that there is no difference whatsoever between the humanity of Christ and ours, except our sin; that in order to reconcile usback to God He needed to become exactly what we are. This teaching led to his condemnation as a heretic.However, the same kind of teaching on the true humanity ofChrist can be traced to the Church Fathers. Both Irenaeue and Athanasius emphasized the. true humanity of Christ as.Irving does. Although they. do not use the exact terminology of ~fallen human nature~,their teaching is easentislly the same. Gregory of Nyasa is the clearest in this teaching with the exact terminology that Christ assumed fallen human
jesus god man doctrine incarnation edward light teach church fathers relevance african context doctrine incarnation stem doctrine fall fall effect human_nature man reason become subject bodily desire whole man nature become corrupt sense always turn_towards sin enslavement human_nature sin freely refer human_nature stuff identify sin nature incarnation christ take human_nature exactly condition fall point difference whatsoever humanity_christ except sin order reconcile god need become exactly teach lead condemnation kind teach true humanity trace church fathers athanasius emphasize the true humanity_christ although they use exact terminology human_nature teach same gregory clear teach exact terminology christ assume fall human