The paragon of animals : anthropocentrism and human origins
Recent years have seen the development of the ~animal turn~ and the rise of animal studies as a multi-disciplinary field dedicated to moving beyond anthropocentrism. Yet its ripples have been barely felt within archaeology, and not at all within the study of human origins, arguably the domain where these insights are most keenly needed given its focus on ~what it means to be human~. This thesis takes the form of a critical history of the discipline, that we might better understand the way forward. I seek to illuminate the degree to which there has been intellectual continuity in the discourse, and the degree to which this discourse has been driven by anthropocentric political ideology. To this end I examine two themes within human origins research, phylogeny and mind, looking firstly at texts from the earlier decades of the discipline and subsequently at those from recent decades. I show that, both in phylogenetic and mental/cultural terms, the loaded dichotomy between human and animal, as well as ~moderns~ and ~archaics~, has been continually forced upon the data to meet political ends, with a priori conclusions having made the recognition of contrary evidence virtually impossible. This is as true now as
Evans, Merline
The paragon of animals : anthropocentrism and human origins. Recent years have seen the development of the ~animal turn~ and the rise of animal studies as a multi-disciplinary field dedicated to moving beyond anthropocentrism. Yet its ripples have been barely felt within archaeology, and not at all within the study of human origins, arguably the domain where these insights are most keenly needed given its focus on ~what it means to be human~. This thesis takes the form of a critical history of the discipline, that we might better understand the way forward. I seek to illuminate the degree to which there has been intellectual continuity in the discourse, and the degree to which this discourse has been driven by anthropocentric political ideology. To this end I examine two themes within human origins research, phylogeny and mind, looking firstly at texts from the earlier decades of the discipline and subsequently at those from recent decades. I show that, both in phylogenetic and mental/cultural terms, the loaded dichotomy between human and animal, as well as ~moderns~ and ~archaics~, has been continually forced upon the data to meet political ends, with a priori conclusions having made the recognition of contrary evidence virtually impossible. This is as true now as
animal human origin see development animal turn rise animal study multi_disciplinary field dedicate move_beyond yet barely felt within_archaeology within study human origin arguably domain insight keenly need give focus what mean_human take_form critical_history discipline might better way forward seek_illuminate degree intellectual continuity discourse degree discourse drive anthropocentric political_ideology end examine two_theme within human origin phylogeny mind look firstly texts discipline subsequently show phylogenetic mental cultural term load dichotomy human_animal well continually force upon data meet political end priori conclusion make recognition contrary evidence virtually impossible true