The literary structure of Luke 4:14-24:53 : a new proposal
The Gospel of Luke exhibits numerous correspondence between pericopes, some related to structure and others not. Those that were intentional reflect how Luke understood the individual units of tradition that were incorporated into Luke-Acts. They reflect an interrelationship he perceived between the corresponding pericopes. Accordingly, in the process of composing his volumes, Luke read the individual units of tradition intertextually, in the light of each other. This thesis adopts a form of the literary theory called ~intertextuality~ that accepts the importance of the author for the interpretation of certain types of text. The intent of Luke is frequently sought through the evidence of the correspondences. Robert C. Tannehill has studied intertextual correspondences in Luke-Acts that are not strictly structural in nature. His work is evaluated in the first chapter of the thesis. Eleven rigorous tests that assess the probability of authorial intent behind proposed correspondences are formulated and applied to proposals. Many withstand this scrutiny, but several do not. The second chapter applies the same tests to Charles H. Talbert's often extensive sets of Luke-Acts correspondences. He considers these to
McComiskey, Douglas S.
Gospel
The literary structure of Luke 4:14-24:53 : a new proposal. The Gospel of Luke exhibits numerous correspondence between pericopes, some related to structure and others not. Those that were intentional reflect how Luke understood the individual units of tradition that were incorporated into Luke-Acts. They reflect an interrelationship he perceived between the corresponding pericopes. Accordingly, in the process of composing his volumes, Luke read the individual units of tradition intertextually, in the light of each other. This thesis adopts a form of the literary theory called ~intertextuality~ that accepts the importance of the author for the interpretation of certain types of text. The intent of Luke is frequently sought through the evidence of the correspondences. Robert C. Tannehill has studied intertextual correspondences in Luke-Acts that are not strictly structural in nature. His work is evaluated in the first chapter of the thesis. Eleven rigorous tests that assess the probability of authorial intent behind proposed correspondences are formulated and applied to proposals. Many withstand this scrutiny, but several do not. The second chapter applies the same tests to Charles H. Talbert's often extensive sets of Luke-Acts correspondences. He considers these to
literary structure luke new proposal gospel luke exhibit numerous correspondence pericopes related structure others_not intentional reflect luke understand individual unit tradition incorporate luke_acts reflect interrelationship perceive corresponding pericopes accordingly process compose volume luke read individual unit tradition light other adopts form literary theory call intertextuality accepts importance author interpretation certain_type text intent luke frequently seek evidence correspondence study intertextual correspondence luke_acts strictly structural nature work evaluate first thesis eleven rigorous test assess probability authorial intent behind proposed correspondence formulate applied proposal many scrutiny several not second applies test charles often extensive set luke_acts correspondence considers