After Derrida before Husserl : the spacing between phenomenology and deconstruction
This Ph.D. thesis is, in large part, a deepening of my M. A. dissertation, entitled: ~DiffĂ©rance Beyond Phenomenological Reduction (EpochĂ©)?~ - an edited version of which was published in The Warwick Journal of Philosophy, Vol. 2, Issue 2, 1989. The M. A. dissertation explores the development of the various phases of the movement of epochĂ© in Edmund Husserl's phenomenology and its relevance for Jacques Derrida's project of deconstruction. The analyses not only attend to the need for an effective propaedeutic to an understanding of phenomenology as method, they also serve to demystify the logics of Derridean non-teleological strategy by explaining the sense of such a manoeuvre - as a kind of maieutic response to the Husserlian project - which operates within the horizon of a radical epochĂ©. According to this orientation, Derrida's deconstruction of phenomenology is permitted to open itself up to a phenomenology of deconstruction. This doctoral thesis develops these analyses and utilizes a form of critique that points the way to the possibility of a phenomenological-deconstruction of the limits of Derrida's project of deconstruction through the themes of epochĂ©, play, dialogue, spacing, and temporalization.
Sandowsky, Louis N.
B Philosophy (General)
After Derrida before Husserl : the spacing between phenomenology and deconstruction. This Ph.D. thesis is, in large part, a deepening of my M. A. dissertation, entitled: ~DiffĂ©rance Beyond Phenomenological Reduction (EpochĂ©)?~ - an edited version of which was published in The Warwick Journal of Philosophy, Vol. 2, Issue 2, 1989. The M. A. dissertation explores the development of the various phases of the movement of epochĂ© in Edmund Husserl's phenomenology and its relevance for Jacques Derrida's project of deconstruction. The analyses not only attend to the need for an effective propaedeutic to an understanding of phenomenology as method, they also serve to demystify the logics of Derridean non-teleological strategy by explaining the sense of such a manoeuvre - as a kind of maieutic response to the Husserlian project - which operates within the horizon of a radical epochĂ©. According to this orientation, Derrida's deconstruction of phenomenology is permitted to open itself up to a phenomenology of deconstruction. This doctoral thesis develops these analyses and utilizes a form of critique that points the way to the possibility of a phenomenological-deconstruction of the limits of Derrida's project of deconstruction through the themes of epochĂ©, play, dialogue, spacing, and temporalization.
derrida husserl spacing phenomenology deconstruction phd large_part deepen entitle beyond phenomenological reduction edit version publish journal philosophy issue explore development various phase movement husserl phenomenology relevance jacques_derrida project deconstruction analysis attend need effective phenomenology method also_serve logic derridean non teleological strategy explain sense manoeuvre kind response husserlian project operate_within horizon radical according orientation derrida deconstruction phenomenology permit open phenomenology deconstruction doctoral develop analysis utilizes form critique point way possibility phenomenological deconstruction limit derrida project deconstruction theme play dialogue space