The agency account of moral status : defending the equal moral status of humans and non-human animals
In this thesis, I argue that humans and sentient animals have equal moral status in the sense that they ought to have like interests equally considered. Furthermore, they are owed strong pro tanto duties to be free from having pain inflicted upon them, having their lives ended and having their liberty restricted. I argue for these claims by developing and defending an account of moral status grounded in agency. This account takes agency, understood as the capacity to act on motivating reasons, to be the necessary and sufficient condition for moral status. Further, I argue that agency is sufficient to have interests in liberty, continued existence and freedom from pain. As such we pro tanto wrong agents when we frustrate these interests. I show that sentient beings necessarily possess agency in the relevant sense, because the best account of the nature of sentience, entails that sentient beings have the psychological resources to form and act upon motivating reasons. Thus, I argue that sentient animals must possess interests in liberty, continued existence and freedom from pain, just as autonomous agents do. Therefore we should take all agents, regardless of further facts about their abilities, to possess equal
Wilcox, Marc Gareth
The agency account of moral status : defending the equal moral status of humans and non-human animals. In this thesis, I argue that humans and sentient animals have equal moral status in the sense that they ought to have like interests equally considered. Furthermore, they are owed strong pro tanto duties to be free from having pain inflicted upon them, having their lives ended and having their liberty restricted. I argue for these claims by developing and defending an account of moral status grounded in agency. This account takes agency, understood as the capacity to act on motivating reasons, to be the necessary and sufficient condition for moral status. Further, I argue that agency is sufficient to have interests in liberty, continued existence and freedom from pain. As such we pro tanto wrong agents when we frustrate these interests. I show that sentient beings necessarily possess agency in the relevant sense, because the best account of the nature of sentience, entails that sentient beings have the psychological resources to form and act upon motivating reasons. Thus, I argue that sentient animals must possess interests in liberty, continued existence and freedom from pain, just as autonomous agents do. Therefore we should take all agents, regardless of further facts about their abilities, to possess equal
agency account_moral status defend equal moral_status human non_human_animal argue human animal equal moral_status sense ought like interest equally consider furthermore owe strong pro duty free pain inflict upon life end liberty restrict argue_claim develop_defend account_moral status ground agency account take agency understood capacity act motivate reason necessary_sufficient condition moral_status argue agency sufficient interest liberty continue_existence freedom pain pro wrong agent frustrate interest show being necessarily possess agency relevant sense best account nature entails being psychological resource form act_upon motivate reason thus argue animal must possess interest liberty continue_existence freedom pain autonomous agent therefore take agent regardless facts ability posse equal