Imperceptible individuals : issues in the applications of social theory to Lower Palaeolithic material culture
This thesis aims to explore whether idiosyncrasies in Acheulean handaxe manufacture can be seen and, if so, whether these can be used to trace the actions of hominins within the Lower Palaeolithic. This analysis has important implications for the application of current social theory to Palaeolithic contexts, which advocates a 'bottom-up' approach to archaeological study. This socially orientated theoretical approach emphasises the individual as the primary unit of analysis. However, as Hopkinson and White (2005) state, there is currently no methodology for such an analysis, rendering many discussions as exercises in what has been termed 'theoretical storytelling'. Using a series of innovative experiments, the question of whether the individual is a viable unit of analysis was tested. The results show that a suite of other factors that also contribute to stone tool manufacture currently masks the actions of individuals. Chief amongst these is variability in the raw material nodules selected for reduction. However, intra-site variability may indicate differences that are linked to socially mediated knapping strategies, or 'group templates' (c.f. Ashton & McNabb 1994). While this possibility requires further
Foulds, Frederick William Francis
Imperceptible individuals : issues in the applications of social theory to Lower Palaeolithic material culture. This thesis aims to explore whether idiosyncrasies in Acheulean handaxe manufacture can be seen and, if so, whether these can be used to trace the actions of hominins within the Lower Palaeolithic. This analysis has important implications for the application of current social theory to Palaeolithic contexts, which advocates a 'bottom-up' approach to archaeological study. This socially orientated theoretical approach emphasises the individual as the primary unit of analysis. However, as Hopkinson and White (2005) state, there is currently no methodology for such an analysis, rendering many discussions as exercises in what has been termed 'theoretical storytelling'. Using a series of innovative experiments, the question of whether the individual is a viable unit of analysis was tested. The results show that a suite of other factors that also contribute to stone tool manufacture currently masks the actions of individuals. Chief amongst these is variability in the raw material nodules selected for reduction. However, intra-site variability may indicate differences that are linked to socially mediated knapping strategies, or 'group templates' (c.f. Ashton & McNabb 1994). While this possibility requires further
individual issue application social_theory lower_palaeolithic material_culture aim_explore whether idiosyncrasy acheulean manufacture see_whether use trace action hominins within lower_palaeolithic analysis important_implication application current social_theory palaeolithic context advocate bottom_up archaeological_study socially orientated theoretical emphasis individual primary unit analysis however white state currently analysis render many discussion exercise term theoretical storytelling using series innovative question_whether individual viable unit analysis test show suite factor also_contribute stone_tool manufacture currently mask action individual chief amongst variability raw_material select reduction however intra_site variability may indicate difference link socially mediated strategy group possibility require