Moral judgements and motivation : an 'emotionalist' externalism about the 'reliable connection'
This thesis examines the role of emotions in morality and in particular their relation to moral judgements. Despite the emerging view in philosophy that the long-standing perceived antagonism between reason and emotion is unjustified, metaethical theories are still largely informed by the Cartesian understanding of the mind: if moral judgements are the exercise of a rational capacity they must preclude emotions. One consequence of this view is a distorted view of moral agents' capacity for motivated, emotion-elicited, moral knowledge and action. The account of emotion I develop here aims to do justice to their epistemic as well as motivating role. Moral motivation has been commonly understood with reference to Humean psychology: motivation is analysed either in terms of desire-like states, where emotions are not sufficiently distinguished from desires, or in terms of beliefs, where emotions either have no explanatory significance or, if they do, they are identified with intuitions or a kind of evaluative judgement. This thesis defends the view that the emotions are irreducible to either desires or beliefs, where this requires challenging the Humean-Davidsonian theory of mind and action explanation. Thus a
Whiston, Amna
Moral judgements and motivation : an 'emotionalist' externalism about the 'reliable connection'. This thesis examines the role of emotions in morality and in particular their relation to moral judgements. Despite the emerging view in philosophy that the long-standing perceived antagonism between reason and emotion is unjustified, metaethical theories are still largely informed by the Cartesian understanding of the mind: if moral judgements are the exercise of a rational capacity they must preclude emotions. One consequence of this view is a distorted view of moral agents' capacity for motivated, emotion-elicited, moral knowledge and action. The account of emotion I develop here aims to do justice to their epistemic as well as motivating role. Moral motivation has been commonly understood with reference to Humean psychology: motivation is analysed either in terms of desire-like states, where emotions are not sufficiently distinguished from desires, or in terms of beliefs, where emotions either have no explanatory significance or, if they do, they are identified with intuitions or a kind of evaluative judgement. This thesis defends the view that the emotions are irreducible to either desires or beliefs, where this requires challenging the Humean-Davidsonian theory of mind and action explanation. Thus a
moral_judgement motivation externalism reliable connection examines_role emotion morality particular relation moral_judgement despite emerge view philosophy long_standing perceive antagonism reason emotion unjustified metaethical theory still largely informed cartesian mind moral_judgement exercise rational capacity must preclude emotion one_consequence view distort view_moral agent capacity motivate emotion moral_knowledge action account emotion develop aim justice epistemic well_motivate role moral motivation commonly understood reference humean psychology motivation analyse either term desire like state emotion sufficiently distinguish desire term beliefs emotion either explanatory significance identify intuition kind evaluative judgement defends view emotion irreducible either desire_belief require challenge humean davidsonian theory_mind action explanation thus