The motif of the Messianic : law, life, and writing in Agamben's reading of Derrida
This is a study of the relationship between the works of Giorgio Agamben and Jacques Derrida. It explains how the vantage point of Agamben's thought is achieved by rendering Derridean terminology inoperative. It is argued that this enactment of suspension with regards to Derrida is Agamben's way of undoing a theological structure of thought that philosophy has unknowingly appropriated. Agamben claims a position that is decidedly post-Derridean, and it is from this position that his sometimes baffling claims about philosophy and its tradition obtain their justification. The closure of the Derridean era and the inoperativity of Derridean terminology is sealed and traced by a messianic motif. Only Derrida can object to the naivety of Agamben's claims, as he did in his final seminar-series. For anyone else to make such objection would be to take the bait. This is because the apparently dizzying magisterial position that Agamben occupies makes sense only in a philosophical landscape wherein Derrida has become obsolete. However, this thesis will argue how Derrida's thought even in its desuetude continues to exert influence, now as a paradigm of language. As Agamben recalls in his essay âThe Messiah and the Sovereignâ:
Willemse, Arthur
B2430.D48 Derrida ; Jacques ; B3611.A4 Agamben ; Giorgio ; 1942-
The motif of the Messianic : law, life, and writing in Agamben's reading of Derrida. This is a study of the relationship between the works of Giorgio Agamben and Jacques Derrida. It explains how the vantage point of Agamben's thought is achieved by rendering Derridean terminology inoperative. It is argued that this enactment of suspension with regards to Derrida is Agamben's way of undoing a theological structure of thought that philosophy has unknowingly appropriated. Agamben claims a position that is decidedly post-Derridean, and it is from this position that his sometimes baffling claims about philosophy and its tradition obtain their justification. The closure of the Derridean era and the inoperativity of Derridean terminology is sealed and traced by a messianic motif. Only Derrida can object to the naivety of Agamben's claims, as he did in his final seminar-series. For anyone else to make such objection would be to take the bait. This is because the apparently dizzying magisterial position that Agamben occupies makes sense only in a philosophical landscape wherein Derrida has become obsolete. However, this thesis will argue how Derrida's thought even in its desuetude continues to exert influence, now as a paradigm of language. As Agamben recalls in his essay âThe Messiah and the Sovereignâ:
motif messianic law life write reading derrida study relationship work jacques_derrida explain vantage_point think achieve render derridean terminology argue enactment suspension regard derrida way theological structure think philosophy appropriate claim position decidedly post derridean position sometimes claim_philosophy tradition obtain justification closure derridean era derridean terminology seal traced messianic motif derrida object claim final seminar series anyone else make objection would take apparently magisterial position occupy make_sense philosophical landscape wherein derrida become however_argue derrida think even continue exert influence paradigm language recall essay messiah sovereign