How monstrosity and geography were used to define the other in early medieval Europe
My thesis deals with texts that are either often not investigated in their entirety or that have large portions of their narratives overlooked in favour of more traditionally popular sections. The stories and descriptions of monstrous races included in these texts, many of which are cornerstones of western myth â cynocephali, amazons, cyclopes, giants, dragons, etc. â were inherited by the Early Middle Ages from its Greco-Roman past and redeployed in response to shifting frontiers, both literally and metaphorically in order to make sense of their new world. My thesis is very much an inter-disciplinary study, making use of anthropological and literary theory concerning social identity and the conceptions of the fabulous, miraculous, and the monstrous and combines a close textual analysis of primary source material with a detailed reconstruction of the context in which these texts were created and transmitted. What was it about these particular texts that resulted in their widespread transmission? How were these descriptions of the monstrous used to define the other? How were these same descriptions used to define barbarian groups? Was there a geographical link between where these texts placed their monsters
Berg, Jason Ryan
How monstrosity and geography were used to define the other in early medieval Europe. My thesis deals with texts that are either often not investigated in their entirety or that have large portions of their narratives overlooked in favour of more traditionally popular sections. The stories and descriptions of monstrous races included in these texts, many of which are cornerstones of western myth â cynocephali, amazons, cyclopes, giants, dragons, etc. â were inherited by the Early Middle Ages from its Greco-Roman past and redeployed in response to shifting frontiers, both literally and metaphorically in order to make sense of their new world. My thesis is very much an inter-disciplinary study, making use of anthropological and literary theory concerning social identity and the conceptions of the fabulous, miraculous, and the monstrous and combines a close textual analysis of primary source material with a detailed reconstruction of the context in which these texts were created and transmitted. What was it about these particular texts that resulted in their widespread transmission? How were these descriptions of the monstrous used to define the other? How were these same descriptions used to define barbarian groups? Was there a geographical link between where these texts placed their monsters
geography use define early_medieval europe deal texts either often investigate entirety large portion narrative overlook favour traditionally popular section story description race include text many cornerstone western myth giant dragon etc inherit greco_roman past response shift frontier literally metaphorically order make_sense new_world much inter_disciplinary study make_use anthropological literary theory concern social_identity conception miraculous combine close_textual analysis primary_source_material detail reconstruction context text create transmit particular text result widespread transmission description use define description use define barbarian group geographical link text place monster