A defence of the Doctrine of Double Effect
The defence of the Doctrine of Double Effect (DDE) that we propose involves accepting the idea that there is a distinction to be drawn between making judgements about the moral worth of a given agent, who either does or does not perform a given act, and making judgement about the moral permissibility or impermissibility of a given act. What we propose is that the DDE is made up of two quite distinct doctrines - each with its own function to fulfil. We refer to these two doctrines as the Intentions Doctrine and the Means Doctrine. It is our claim that it is through the application of the Intentions Doctrine that we can determine the moral worth of a given agent, and it is through the application of the Means Doctrine that we can determine the moral permissibility or impermissibility of a given act. Given that our concern is with how we are to determine the moral permissibility or impermissibility of a given act, the focus of this thesis is directed towards the application of the Means Doctrine. This proposal stands in opposition to the way the DDE is traditionally presented. Traditionally the DDE has been presented as allowing the moral permissibility of an act that has two effects - one good (proportionately
Muir, Betty-Ann
Moral; Intention; Means
A defence of the Doctrine of Double Effect. The defence of the Doctrine of Double Effect (DDE) that we propose involves accepting the idea that there is a distinction to be drawn between making judgements about the moral worth of a given agent, who either does or does not perform a given act, and making judgement about the moral permissibility or impermissibility of a given act. What we propose is that the DDE is made up of two quite distinct doctrines - each with its own function to fulfil. We refer to these two doctrines as the Intentions Doctrine and the Means Doctrine. It is our claim that it is through the application of the Intentions Doctrine that we can determine the moral worth of a given agent, and it is through the application of the Means Doctrine that we can determine the moral permissibility or impermissibility of a given act. Given that our concern is with how we are to determine the moral permissibility or impermissibility of a given act, the focus of this thesis is directed towards the application of the Means Doctrine. This proposal stands in opposition to the way the DDE is traditionally presented. Traditionally the DDE has been presented as allowing the moral permissibility of an act that has two effects - one good (proportionately
defence doctrine double effect defence doctrine double effect propose involves accept idea distinction_drawn make judgement moral worth give agent either perform give act make judgement moral give act propose make quite distinct doctrine function fulfil refer doctrine doctrine doctrine claim application doctrine determine moral worth give agent application doctrine determine moral give act given concern determine moral give act focus direct_towards application doctrine proposal stand opposition way traditionally present traditionally present allow moral act effect good