Sex and gender roles in gentle and noble families, c.1575-1660, with a particular focus on marriage formation
The thesis examines thinking about, and experiences of, gender roles and family relationships for the gentry and nobility, particularly through the process of marriage formation. The study draws on a range of sources, including collections of family letters, personal memoirs and prescriptive literature. Some chapters pursue a case study approach to correspondence. Others consider the relationship between published advice and personal attitudes and experience. The study explores whether there were contradictions in thinking on family life, gender, love and marriage, as some historians have claimed, and seeks to disentangle the overlaps and inter-relationships between these broad themes. While family and gender roles were multi-layered and multi-faceted, thinking and practice were neither incoherent nor conflicting. Rather, they were highly complex and treated as such. How marriages were forged and male and female roles in this process and in marriage itself required the balancing of many factors. Prescription recognised this and practice reinforced the need for pragmatism. Moreover, advice was not monolithic, but nuanced according to its purpose and intended audience. Gender roles, family relationships and
Gosling, Sally Catherine
Patriarchy; Kinship structures
Sex and gender roles in gentle and noble families, c.1575-1660, with a particular focus on marriage formation. The thesis examines thinking about, and experiences of, gender roles and family relationships for the gentry and nobility, particularly through the process of marriage formation. The study draws on a range of sources, including collections of family letters, personal memoirs and prescriptive literature. Some chapters pursue a case study approach to correspondence. Others consider the relationship between published advice and personal attitudes and experience. The study explores whether there were contradictions in thinking on family life, gender, love and marriage, as some historians have claimed, and seeks to disentangle the overlaps and inter-relationships between these broad themes. While family and gender roles were multi-layered and multi-faceted, thinking and practice were neither incoherent nor conflicting. Rather, they were highly complex and treated as such. How marriages were forged and male and female roles in this process and in marriage itself required the balancing of many factors. Prescription recognised this and practice reinforced the need for pragmatism. Moreover, advice was not monolithic, but nuanced according to its purpose and intended audience. Gender roles, family relationships and
sex_gender role noble_family particular_focus marriage formation examines think experience gender_role family relationship gentry nobility particularly process marriage formation study_draw range_source include collection family letter personal memoir prescriptive literature pursue case_study correspondence others consider relationship publish advice personal attitude experience study_explore whether contradiction think family_life gender love marriage historian claim seek disentangle overlap inter_relationships broad_theme family gender roles multi_layered multi_faceted think practice neither incoherent conflicting rather highly_complex treat such marriage forge male_female role process marriage require balance many_factor prescription recognise practice reinforce need pragmatism moreover advice monolithic nuanced accord purpose intend_audience gender_role family relationship