A study of activity at Neolithic causewayed enclosures within the British Isles
Since the first explorations of causewayed enclosures, archaeologists have attempted to define these early Neolithic monuments in relation to territorial patterns, pottery typologies, and ultimately though the concept of structured deposition. While these concepts have been important in advancing our knowledge of causewayed enclosures, the interpretations of the material from the enclosures ditch segments and other areas of these sites have failed to take into account the importance of how objects and materials came to be at the sites, were produced and used there, preceding deposition. This thesis argues that activities at enclosures should not be categorically separated from the everyday activities of those who visited the enclosures. I argue that by looking in detail at the spatial and temporal distribution of objects in association with chronology that the practical activities people engaged in at enclosures have been overshadowed by interpretations stressing the ritual nature of structured deposits. These activities had a direct relationship with enclosures and local landscapes. This argues that perhaps more deposits within causewayed enclosures were the result of everyday activities which occurred while
Albrecht, Brian Glenn
A study of activity at Neolithic causewayed enclosures within the British Isles. Since the first explorations of causewayed enclosures, archaeologists have attempted to define these early Neolithic monuments in relation to territorial patterns, pottery typologies, and ultimately though the concept of structured deposition. While these concepts have been important in advancing our knowledge of causewayed enclosures, the interpretations of the material from the enclosures ditch segments and other areas of these sites have failed to take into account the importance of how objects and materials came to be at the sites, were produced and used there, preceding deposition. This thesis argues that activities at enclosures should not be categorically separated from the everyday activities of those who visited the enclosures. I argue that by looking in detail at the spatial and temporal distribution of objects in association with chronology that the practical activities people engaged in at enclosures have been overshadowed by interpretations stressing the ritual nature of structured deposits. These activities had a direct relationship with enclosures and local landscapes. This argues that perhaps more deposits within causewayed enclosures were the result of everyday activities which occurred while
study activity neolithic enclosure within british_isles since first exploration enclosure archaeologist attempt_define early_neolithic monument relation territorial pattern pottery typology ultimately though concept structure deposition concept important advance knowledge enclosure interpretation material enclosures ditch segment area site fail_take account importance object material come site produce use precede deposition argues activity enclosures categorically separate everyday activity visit enclosure argue look_detail spatial_temporal distribution object association chronology practical activity people_engage enclosure overshadow interpretation stress ritual nature structure deposit activity direct relationship enclosures local landscape argues perhaps deposit_within causewayed_enclosure everyday activity occur