Surpassing all other kings : Mesopotamian kingship ideology in the Gilgamesh tradition and the Alexander the Great narratives
This thesis identifies and elucidates a common engagement with Mesopotamian kingship ideology in the Gilgamesh and the Alexander the Great narrative traditions. As both archetypal monarchs are understood to have ruled as kings in Mesopotamia, this is a much more secure context for comparison. The result of this contextualisation is that the identified parallels are better supported and more clearly understood. Although the study is rendered in comparison, the exegesis of the episodes is not strictly bound by parallels between the traditions. The primary concern is a comparable engagement with Mesopotamian kingship ideology. This enables the thesis to contribute uniquely to the study of each figureâs kingship, as well as their comparative dynamic. Mesopotamian kingship was a contest, and our two subject kings represent rivals for the pinnacle in this arena. Therefore, the identification and presentation of a king to surpass all others is argued for both in presented deeds and persevering legends. Chapter one outlines the premise of the thesis, addresses previous comparisons made in scholarship between the subject kings, and discusses the evidence. Specifically, this is the network of narratives utilised by
Ryan, James Richard
Surpassing all other kings : Mesopotamian kingship ideology in the Gilgamesh tradition and the Alexander the Great narratives. This thesis identifies and elucidates a common engagement with Mesopotamian kingship ideology in the Gilgamesh and the Alexander the Great narrative traditions. As both archetypal monarchs are understood to have ruled as kings in Mesopotamia, this is a much more secure context for comparison. The result of this contextualisation is that the identified parallels are better supported and more clearly understood. Although the study is rendered in comparison, the exegesis of the episodes is not strictly bound by parallels between the traditions. The primary concern is a comparable engagement with Mesopotamian kingship ideology. This enables the thesis to contribute uniquely to the study of each figureâs kingship, as well as their comparative dynamic. Mesopotamian kingship was a contest, and our two subject kings represent rivals for the pinnacle in this arena. Therefore, the identification and presentation of a king to surpass all others is argued for both in presented deeds and persevering legends. Chapter one outlines the premise of the thesis, addresses previous comparisons made in scholarship between the subject kings, and discusses the evidence. Specifically, this is the network of narratives utilised by
king mesopotamian kingship ideology tradition alexander_great narrative identifies elucidate common engagement mesopotamian kingship ideology alexander_great narrative tradition archetypal monarch understand king mesopotamia much secure context comparison contextualisation identify parallel well support clearly understood although study render comparison exegesis episode strictly bound parallel tradition primary_concern comparable engagement mesopotamian kingship ideology enables contribute uniquely study figure kingship well comparative dynamic mesopotamian kingship contest subject king represent rival arena therefore identification presentation king surpass others argue presented deed legend one_outline premise address previous comparison_make scholarship subject king discuss evidence specifically network narrative utilise