The routes of sense : thought, semantic underdeterminacy and compositionality
What does it mean to be a rational language user? What is it to obey linguistic rules? What is the proper account of linguistic competence? A Fregean answer to these questions would make essential appeal to the notion of sense: we are masters of a language to the extent that we are able to recognise the cognitive value of its expressions; we are rational judges regarding truth-value assignments to the extent that we are sensitive to the ways in which the sense of an expression guides us in the semantic evaluation process; and as for obeying rules, it is our ability to respond to how sense directs us, for a particular assertion of a sentence, towards the determination of its truth-value that best exemplifies what it is like to follow a linguistic rule. My thesis explores a cluster of closely interrelated issues arising from these questions (whether or not considered from a Fregean perspective). Accordingly, in tracing the routes of sense my dissertation places itself at the intersection of the philosophy of language, linguistics, philosophy of logic, and meta-ethicsâand indeed, I end up agreeing with Allan Gibbard that the theory of meaning really belongs to meta-ethical reflection. Chapter 1 introduces some
Pedriali, Walter B.
The routes of sense : thought, semantic underdeterminacy and compositionality. What does it mean to be a rational language user? What is it to obey linguistic rules? What is the proper account of linguistic competence? A Fregean answer to these questions would make essential appeal to the notion of sense: we are masters of a language to the extent that we are able to recognise the cognitive value of its expressions; we are rational judges regarding truth-value assignments to the extent that we are sensitive to the ways in which the sense of an expression guides us in the semantic evaluation process; and as for obeying rules, it is our ability to respond to how sense directs us, for a particular assertion of a sentence, towards the determination of its truth-value that best exemplifies what it is like to follow a linguistic rule. My thesis explores a cluster of closely interrelated issues arising from these questions (whether or not considered from a Fregean perspective). Accordingly, in tracing the routes of sense my dissertation places itself at the intersection of the philosophy of language, linguistics, philosophy of logic, and meta-ethicsâand indeed, I end up agreeing with Allan Gibbard that the theory of meaning really belongs to meta-ethical reflection. Chapter 1 introduces some
route sense thought semantic underdeterminacy compositionality mean rational language_user obey linguistic_rule proper account linguistic_competence fregean answer_question would_make essential appeal notion sense master language extent able recognise cognitive value expression rational judge regard truth_value assignment extent sensitive way sense expression guide semantic evaluation process obey rule ability respond sense direct particular assertion sentence towards determination truth_value best exemplifies like follow linguistic_rule explores cluster closely interrelated issue_arise question_whether consider fregean perspective accordingly trace route sense_place intersection philosophy_language linguistics philosophy_logic meta_ethics indeed end agree theory mean really belong meta_ethical reflection introduces