Diplomatic, ideological and military aspects of the Russo-Turkish war (1768-1774)
The study of Russo-Turkish relations has enough historic interest because it covers many aspects of the Eastern Question. The Russo-Turkish war of 1768-1774 was the point where the course of the Russo-Turkish relations changed. During the previous decades, Russia tried to establish its position in the south and it was quite successful after capturing Azov in 1696. However, the Turks managed to gain Azov back from the Russians (1711) and maintained their supremacy in the Black Sea. By the end of the war (1774) the Turks lost Crimea which became an independent state. On the other hand, the Russians gained considerable territorial, religious and commercial advantages over the Turks. From the diplomatic point of view, the triangle between Russia, Turkey and major European states (Britain/France) functioned in the most disharmonious way. Having similar interests, Russia and the states of Western Europe struggled for which country would gain more out of Turkey. Turkish diplomacy had no alternatives other than offering more and more financial and territorial interests to France or Britain every time Turkey was threatened by Russia. In exchange Turkey managed to get protection, mainly from France. That becomes quite
Papavlassopoulos, Kosmas
Crimea; Black Sea; Balkans
Diplomatic, ideological and military aspects of the Russo-Turkish war (1768-1774). The study of Russo-Turkish relations has enough historic interest because it covers many aspects of the Eastern Question. The Russo-Turkish war of 1768-1774 was the point where the course of the Russo-Turkish relations changed. During the previous decades, Russia tried to establish its position in the south and it was quite successful after capturing Azov in 1696. However, the Turks managed to gain Azov back from the Russians (1711) and maintained their supremacy in the Black Sea. By the end of the war (1774) the Turks lost Crimea which became an independent state. On the other hand, the Russians gained considerable territorial, religious and commercial advantages over the Turks. From the diplomatic point of view, the triangle between Russia, Turkey and major European states (Britain/France) functioned in the most disharmonious way. Having similar interests, Russia and the states of Western Europe struggled for which country would gain more out of Turkey. Turkish diplomacy had no alternatives other than offering more and more financial and territorial interests to France or Britain every time Turkey was threatened by Russia. In exchange Turkey managed to get protection, mainly from France. That becomes quite
diplomatic ideological military aspect russo turkish war study russo turkish relation enough historic interest cover many_aspect eastern question russo turkish war point course russo turkish relation change russia try_establish position south quite successful capture however turks manage gain back russians maintain supremacy black_sea end_war turks lose become independent state hand russians gain considerable territorial religious commercial advantage turks diplomatic point_view russia turkey major_european state britain_france function way similar interest russia state western_europe struggle country would gain turkey turkish diplomacy alternative offer financial territorial interest france_britain every time turkey threaten russia exchange turkey manage get protection mainly france becomes quite