A reappraisal of the American eugenics movement, in the light of German eugenics (1918-1945)
The accepted version of the history of eugenics - put forward by Kevles, Allen and Barkan amongst others - is that the example of Nazi eugenics contributed to the decline of the eugenics movement in the USA. This dissertation challenges that view and argues that Nazism was irrelevant to that decline. In so doing this work argues against the widely held chronology of American eugenics. Whilst most historians suggest that the older (orthodox) style of American eugenics was weakened by 1933 and then killed off by Nazism, this work argues that it was already finished by 1933. Historians have argued that the newer (reform) eugenics movement began to decline and transformed itself into new fields and organisations partly because eugenics was so widely discredited by Nazism. This dissertation suggests that reform eugenics was not a coherent ideology, but was rather a collection of reactions to the older type of eugenics. As such it could only exist while there was an older eugenics movement to react against. It then voluntarily transformed itself into new fields, as it was too diverse to survive. The fields which developed using parts of the eugenics ideology included population control movements, birth control and
Lelliott, Jonathan Andrew
Nazi; Nazism
A reappraisal of the American eugenics movement, in the light of German eugenics (1918-1945). The accepted version of the history of eugenics - put forward by Kevles, Allen and Barkan amongst others - is that the example of Nazi eugenics contributed to the decline of the eugenics movement in the USA. This dissertation challenges that view and argues that Nazism was irrelevant to that decline. In so doing this work argues against the widely held chronology of American eugenics. Whilst most historians suggest that the older (orthodox) style of American eugenics was weakened by 1933 and then killed off by Nazism, this work argues that it was already finished by 1933. Historians have argued that the newer (reform) eugenics movement began to decline and transformed itself into new fields and organisations partly because eugenics was so widely discredited by Nazism. This dissertation suggests that reform eugenics was not a coherent ideology, but was rather a collection of reactions to the older type of eugenics. As such it could only exist while there was an older eugenics movement to react against. It then voluntarily transformed itself into new fields, as it was too diverse to survive. The fields which developed using parts of the eugenics ideology included population control movements, birth control and
reappraisal american movement light german accepted version history put_forward allen amongst_others example nazi contribute decline movement usa challenge_view argues nazism irrelevant decline work argues widely_hold chronology american whilst historians suggest older orthodox style american weaken kill nazism work argues already finish historians argue new reform movement begin decline transform new field organisation partly widely discredit nazism suggests reform coherent ideology rather collection reaction older type could exist old movement react against voluntarily transform new field diverse survive field develop use part ideology include population control movement birth control