Aspects of the collocational analysis of meaning with special reference to some Biblical Hebrew anatomical idioms
Although the biblical data presented can be properly assessed only by a Hebraist/Old Testament exegete, I have attempted to make the work a little more accessible to linguistic scientists without specialization in Hebrew through provision of English glosses of Hebrew passages (rarely of more than a biblical verse in length). Typically these glosses are from NEB, although where NEB's rendering does not closely match the Hebrew sequence (e.g., if NEB omits certain Hebrew phrases because they would be redundant or cumbersome in English, or adopts substantial emendations of NT, or is, in my opinion, erroneous in respect of a particular translation) I have utilized JB, or, occasionally, AV. Italicized sequences (narking expressions not directly expressed in the Hebrew original) in AV (and in the translation of Rash!) are not thus distinguished in my quotations, and I have used 'Lord' for AV and NEB 'LORD'. NEB has been chosen as the primary source because at a semantic, if not a stylistic, level it provides an 'idiomatic' translation, and because its emendations are easy to trace (through Brockington's work). The few tines that I wish to make a translation point particularly strongly or where I feel none of the
Elwolde, John Francis Nicholas Magnus
Linguistics ; Religion ; Philosophy
Aspects of the collocational analysis of meaning with special reference to some Biblical Hebrew anatomical idioms. Although the biblical data presented can be properly assessed only by a Hebraist/Old Testament exegete, I have attempted to make the work a little more accessible to linguistic scientists without specialization in Hebrew through provision of English glosses of Hebrew passages (rarely of more than a biblical verse in length). Typically these glosses are from NEB, although where NEB's rendering does not closely match the Hebrew sequence (e.g., if NEB omits certain Hebrew phrases because they would be redundant or cumbersome in English, or adopts substantial emendations of NT, or is, in my opinion, erroneous in respect of a particular translation) I have utilized JB, or, occasionally, AV. Italicized sequences (narking expressions not directly expressed in the Hebrew original) in AV (and in the translation of Rash!) are not thus distinguished in my quotations, and I have used 'Lord' for AV and NEB 'LORD'. NEB has been chosen as the primary source because at a semantic, if not a stylistic, level it provides an 'idiomatic' translation, and because its emendations are easy to trace (through Brockington's work). The few tines that I wish to make a translation point particularly strongly or where I feel none of the
aspects collocational analysis mean special_reference biblical_hebrew anatomical idiom although biblical data_present properly assess old_testament attempt_make work little accessible linguistic scientist without specialization hebrew provision english gloss hebrew passage rarely biblical verse length typically gloss although render closely match hebrew sequence omit certain hebrew phrase would redundant cumbersome english adopt substantial opinion erroneous respect particular translation utilize occasionally sequence expression directly express hebrew original translation thus distinguish quotation use lord lord choose primary_source semantic stylistic level provide idiomatic translation easy trace work wish make translation point particularly strongly feel none