Political organisation in the United States during the early 1820s
This dissertation challenges recent grand syntheses which talk unhesitatingly of âthe rise of American Democracyâ or âthe democratization of American lifeâ during the early nineteenth century, and place political parties at the forefront of this narrative. In the Introduction, newly-available data on election turnout is employed to demonstrate an inverse relationship between the strength of parties and popular participation at the polls during the early 1820s. Chapter One then examines Federalist-Republican competition, and popular resistance to that framework, in Boston, Massachusetts, in order to show that far from naturally promoting democratisation, parties can serve to sustain the dominance of a small political elite. Chapter Two turns to Illinois where the inhabitants, locked in a struggle over whether to legalise slavery in their state, rejected parties in favour of alternative political arrangements that they considered better suited to their bid to define and implement the will of the people. Chapter Three questions the common assumptions that parties, elections, and policy-making were closely linked during this period, and suggests that political historians should pay more attention to alternative
Peart, D. P.
Political organisation in the United States during the early 1820s. This dissertation challenges recent grand syntheses which talk unhesitatingly of âthe rise of American Democracyâ or âthe democratization of American lifeâ during the early nineteenth century, and place political parties at the forefront of this narrative. In the Introduction, newly-available data on election turnout is employed to demonstrate an inverse relationship between the strength of parties and popular participation at the polls during the early 1820s. Chapter One then examines Federalist-Republican competition, and popular resistance to that framework, in Boston, Massachusetts, in order to show that far from naturally promoting democratisation, parties can serve to sustain the dominance of a small political elite. Chapter Two turns to Illinois where the inhabitants, locked in a struggle over whether to legalise slavery in their state, rejected parties in favour of alternative political arrangements that they considered better suited to their bid to define and implement the will of the people. Chapter Three questions the common assumptions that parties, elections, and policy-making were closely linked during this period, and suggests that political historians should pay more attention to alternative
political_organisation united_states challenge recent grand synthesis talk rise american democracy american life place political_party forefront narrative introduction newly_available data election employed inverse_relationship strength party popular participation poll examine republican competition popular resistance framework boston order_show far naturally promote democratisation party serve sustain dominance small political_elite turn inhabitant lock struggle whether slavery state reject party favour alternative political arrangement consider well suit bid define implement people question common_assumption party election policy_making closely period suggest political historian_pay attention alternative