Pseudo Vowel Harmony in Contemporary Korean: an Optimality Analysis
This study centres on the nature of vowel harmony in contemporary Korean within the framework of Optimality Theory (Prince and Smolensky 1993). The occurrence of vowel harmony is, however, very limited in contemporary Korean, only being found in: (i) ideophones, and (ii) some verbal morphology. Moreover, the phonological behaviour exhibited by the processes in question is very rare cross-linguistically. The present study attempts to solve these puzzles by regarding the vowel harmony of contemporary Korean, not as vowel harmony as such, but as a morphological process that manifests as pseudo vowel harmony. It will be argued throughout the dissertation that this view is decidedly superior to previous ones holding the existence of conventional vowel harmony in contemporary Korean.Our analysis can be summed up as follows: (i) Korean ideophones are accounted for by morpheme-indexed constraints (Pater 2007) that prohibit certain feature values to express certain morphemes, while (ii) Korean suffixal vowel harmony is dealt with local constraint conjunction and morpheme-indexed domain which prohibit certain vowel sequences in a specific morphological condition. Both approaches crucially share the interpretation of
Park, Chang-beom
Pseudo Vowel Harmony in Contemporary Korean: an Optimality Analysis. This study centres on the nature of vowel harmony in contemporary Korean within the framework of Optimality Theory (Prince and Smolensky 1993). The occurrence of vowel harmony is, however, very limited in contemporary Korean, only being found in: (i) ideophones, and (ii) some verbal morphology. Moreover, the phonological behaviour exhibited by the processes in question is very rare cross-linguistically. The present study attempts to solve these puzzles by regarding the vowel harmony of contemporary Korean, not as vowel harmony as such, but as a morphological process that manifests as pseudo vowel harmony. It will be argued throughout the dissertation that this view is decidedly superior to previous ones holding the existence of conventional vowel harmony in contemporary Korean.Our analysis can be summed up as follows: (i) Korean ideophones are accounted for by morpheme-indexed constraints (Pater 2007) that prohibit certain feature values to express certain morphemes, while (ii) Korean suffixal vowel harmony is dealt with local constraint conjunction and morpheme-indexed domain which prohibit certain vowel sequences in a specific morphological condition. Both approaches crucially share the interpretation of
pseudo vowel harmony contemporary korean analysis study centre nature vowel harmony contemporary korean within_framework optimality_theory prince_smolensky occurrence vowel harmony however limited contemporary korean find verbal_morphology moreover phonological behaviour exhibit process question rare cross_linguistically present_study attempt_solve puzzle regard vowel harmony contemporary korean vowel harmony morphological process manifest pseudo vowel harmony argue throughout view decidedly superior previous hold existence conventional vowel harmony contemporary analysis sum follow korean account morpheme constraint prohibit certain feature value express certain morpheme korean vowel harmony deal local constraint conjunction morpheme domain prohibit certain vowel sequence specific morphological condition approach crucially share interpretation