Syntactic and semantic underspecification in the verb phrase
This thesis is concerned with verbs and the relation between verbs and their complements. Syntactic evidence is presented which shows that the distinction between arguments and adjuncts reflects the optionality of adjuncts, but that adjuncts, once introduced, behave as arguments of the verb. An analysis is proposed which reflects this observation by assuming that verbal subcategorization is underspecified, so that optional constituents can be introduced into the verb phrase. The analysis is developed within a formal model of utterance interpretation. Labelled Deductive Systems for Natural Language (LDSNL), proposed in Kempson, Meyer-Viol & Gabbay (1999), which models the structural aspect of utterance interpretation as a dynamic process of tree growth during which lexical information is combined into more complex structures which provide vehicles for interpretation, propositional forms. The contribution of this thesis from the perspective of utterance interpretation is that it explores the notion of structural underspecification with respect to predicate-argument structure. After providing a formalization of underspecified verbal subcategorization, the thesis explores the consequences this analysis of verbs
Marten, Lutz
Arguments; Adjuncts; LDSNL; Swahili; Natural
Syntactic and semantic underspecification in the verb phrase. This thesis is concerned with verbs and the relation between verbs and their complements. Syntactic evidence is presented which shows that the distinction between arguments and adjuncts reflects the optionality of adjuncts, but that adjuncts, once introduced, behave as arguments of the verb. An analysis is proposed which reflects this observation by assuming that verbal subcategorization is underspecified, so that optional constituents can be introduced into the verb phrase. The analysis is developed within a formal model of utterance interpretation. Labelled Deductive Systems for Natural Language (LDSNL), proposed in Kempson, Meyer-Viol & Gabbay (1999), which models the structural aspect of utterance interpretation as a dynamic process of tree growth during which lexical information is combined into more complex structures which provide vehicles for interpretation, propositional forms. The contribution of this thesis from the perspective of utterance interpretation is that it explores the notion of structural underspecification with respect to predicate-argument structure. After providing a formalization of underspecified verbal subcategorization, the thesis explores the consequences this analysis of verbs
syntactic_semantic underspecification verb_phrase concerned verb relation verbs complement syntactic evidence_present show distinction argument adjuncts reflect optionality adjunct adjunct introduce behave argument verb analysis propose reflect observation assume verbal underspecified optional constituent introduce verb_phrase analysis develop within formal model utterance_interpretation labelled deductive systems natural_language propose meyer model structural aspect utterance_interpretation dynamic_process tree growth lexical_information combine complex structure provide vehicle interpretation propositional form perspective utterance_interpretation explore notion structural underspecification respect predicate_argument structure provide underspecified verbal explore_consequence analysis verb