An anonymous commentary on Job, Jewish Theological Seminary NY : an analysis of its authorship and an assessment of its contents
MS L778 is an anonymous commentary on Job emanating from the 12th-century Northern French school of Peshat exegesis. This commentary has been attributed to Rashbam (Rashi's grandson), one of the major representatives of this school. We contend however that MS L778 is not by Rashbam. This is proven by comparing MS L778 with Rashbam's Commentary on the Torah and with citations of his exegesis on the Book of Job by other mediaeval sources. Furthermore, there are a number of characteristics exhibited by Rashbam in his Commentary on the Torah which are absent in MS L778. For example, Rashbam often refers to himself; he is strong in his language of rebuttal; sometimes he accepts, sometimes rejects his grandfather's exegesis. Rashbam applies a clear and consistent differentiation between the two areas of ~Peshat~ and ~Derash.~ Our author in contrast is completely anonymous, giving no hint as to his identity; he does not relate to Talmudic material even to reject it; he refers to Rashi only by the impersonal name of []. In addition, we are in a position to trace the sources from which our author drew much of his material, one of which is indeed Rashbam but another is R'Joseph Kara, from both of whom he took notes
Rosen, Michael Samuel
Peshat exegesis; Northern French movement; Derash
An anonymous commentary on Job, Jewish Theological Seminary NY : an analysis of its authorship and an assessment of its contents. MS L778 is an anonymous commentary on Job emanating from the 12th-century Northern French school of Peshat exegesis. This commentary has been attributed to Rashbam (Rashi's grandson), one of the major representatives of this school. We contend however that MS L778 is not by Rashbam. This is proven by comparing MS L778 with Rashbam's Commentary on the Torah and with citations of his exegesis on the Book of Job by other mediaeval sources. Furthermore, there are a number of characteristics exhibited by Rashbam in his Commentary on the Torah which are absent in MS L778. For example, Rashbam often refers to himself; he is strong in his language of rebuttal; sometimes he accepts, sometimes rejects his grandfather's exegesis. Rashbam applies a clear and consistent differentiation between the two areas of ~Peshat~ and ~Derash.~ Our author in contrast is completely anonymous, giving no hint as to his identity; he does not relate to Talmudic material even to reject it; he refers to Rashi only by the impersonal name of []. In addition, we are in a position to trace the sources from which our author drew much of his material, one of which is indeed Rashbam but another is R'Joseph Kara, from both of whom he took notes
anonymous commentary job jewish theological seminary analysis authorship assessment content anonymous commentary job emanate th_century northern french school exegesis commentary attribute rashi one_major representative school contend however proven compare commentary citation exegesis book_job mediaeval source furthermore number characteristic exhibit commentary absent example often_refer strong language sometimes accept sometimes reject exegesis applies clear consistent differentiation two_area author contrast completely anonymous give hint identity relate talmudic material even reject refers rashi impersonal name addition position trace source author drew much material indeed another take note