The early career of Thomas, Lord Howard, Earl of Surrey and third Duke of Norfolk, 1474-c.1525
Why another thesis on the third duke of Norfolk, and why, in particular, a partial one? It is true that two competent studies of the duke have been made in relatively recent times; the first an M.A. thesis submitted in the University of Nottingham in 1961 by F.R. Grace, and the second, a Ph.D. in the University of Florida, submitted in 1978 by D. Head. Both of these suffer from one besetting problem. Because Norfolk lived to the age of eighty years, and from the age of thirty-eight occupied a very important position in the Tudor state, both were forced to deal almost exclusively with the massive bulk of material which survives concerning his actions in the public domain. The result is that we learned more about Norfolk the politician, but almost nothing new about Norfolk the man. Indeed, I would go further. The pressure to negotiate large quantities of material in the public records at speed forced both researchers to accept without question assumptions about the motivations of the duke which had been current for a very long time, and which a more detailed study of the early part of his life, and attention to private records might have modified.My approach to this task has been to focus attention on the least
Vokes, Susan Elisabeth
History
The early career of Thomas, Lord Howard, Earl of Surrey and third Duke of Norfolk, 1474-c.1525. Why another thesis on the third duke of Norfolk, and why, in particular, a partial one? It is true that two competent studies of the duke have been made in relatively recent times; the first an M.A. thesis submitted in the University of Nottingham in 1961 by F.R. Grace, and the second, a Ph.D. in the University of Florida, submitted in 1978 by D. Head. Both of these suffer from one besetting problem. Because Norfolk lived to the age of eighty years, and from the age of thirty-eight occupied a very important position in the Tudor state, both were forced to deal almost exclusively with the massive bulk of material which survives concerning his actions in the public domain. The result is that we learned more about Norfolk the politician, but almost nothing new about Norfolk the man. Indeed, I would go further. The pressure to negotiate large quantities of material in the public records at speed forced both researchers to accept without question assumptions about the motivations of the duke which had been current for a very long time, and which a more detailed study of the early part of his life, and attention to private records might have modified.My approach to this task has been to focus attention on the least
early_career thomas lord earl surrey third duke norfolk another third duke norfolk particular partial true competent study duke make relatively_recent time first submit university nottingham grace second phd university florida submit head suffer problem norfolk live age thirty occupied important position tudor state force deal almost_exclusively massive bulk material survive concern action public_domain learn norfolk politician almost nothing new norfolk man indeed would far pressure negotiate large_quantity material public record speed force researcher accept without question_assumption motivation duke current long_time detail_study early_part life attention private record might task focus_attention least