A historiography of cultural heritage interpretation and policy in KaesĆng, DPR Korea and their possible impact on inter-Korean rapprochement
Koreaâs dividing ideologies of the past century, and the dominant efforts to legitimise the respective political agendas of the two States, have had an impact on the interpretation of, and the choice of focus within, cultural heritage and history. Cultural heritage policies are part of this particular historical narrative, reflected in heritage interpretations and activities. Whereas the socio-political studies of unification focus on a territorial unification, an approach coming from cultural heritage has the potential advantage of being able to focus on congruence through common roots, views of history and cultural values. Through an analysis of historical events and cultural heritage in the North Korean border town KaesĆng, the research highlights the contribution of cultural heritage to past, present and future national perceptions. It also explores the impact that current socio-political developments have in turn on cultural heritage interpretations. Cultural heritage has not been, and will not to be, the major player in rapprochement politics practiced in South or North Korea. However, as a medium for collective memory and reflection, it can be a useful tool of rapprochement. Although heavily regulated
Scheidhauer, R.
A historiography of cultural heritage interpretation and policy in KaesĆng, DPR Korea and their possible impact on inter-Korean rapprochement. Koreaâs dividing ideologies of the past century, and the dominant efforts to legitimise the respective political agendas of the two States, have had an impact on the interpretation of, and the choice of focus within, cultural heritage and history. Cultural heritage policies are part of this particular historical narrative, reflected in heritage interpretations and activities. Whereas the socio-political studies of unification focus on a territorial unification, an approach coming from cultural heritage has the potential advantage of being able to focus on congruence through common roots, views of history and cultural values. Through an analysis of historical events and cultural heritage in the North Korean border town KaesĆng, the research highlights the contribution of cultural heritage to past, present and future national perceptions. It also explores the impact that current socio-political developments have in turn on cultural heritage interpretations. Cultural heritage has not been, and will not to be, the major player in rapprochement politics practiced in South or North Korea. However, as a medium for collective memory and reflection, it can be a useful tool of rapprochement. Although heavily regulated
historiography cultural_heritage interpretation policy korea possible impact inter korean rapprochement korea divide ideology dominant effort legitimise respective political_agenda states impact interpretation choice focus within cultural_heritage history cultural_heritage policy part particular historical_narrative reflect heritage interpretation activity whereas socio_political study unification focus territorial unification come cultural_heritage potential advantage able focus congruence common root view history cultural_value analysis historical_event cultural_heritage north korean border town highlight cultural_heritage past_present_future national perception also_explore impact current socio_political development turn cultural_heritage interpretation cultural_heritage major player rapprochement politics practice south north korea however medium collective_memory reflection useful_tool rapprochement although heavily regulate