'A barbarous penalty which the community has no right to exact' : why capital punishment was abolished in Britain, 1947-69
This thesis examines why capital punishment was abolished in Britain in spite of the consistent retentionism of the majority of the electorate. It addresses the period between 1947, when abolition was debated as part of the Criminal Justice Bill, and 1969, when capital punishment was abolished permanently for murder. In explaining why capital punishment was abolished, this thesis engages primarily with two broad historiographical narratives for the period: public opinion and liberalisation. It investigates how politicians used public opinion within their arguments and why the electorateâs retentionism did not convince a sufficient number of them to oppose abolition. It places abolition alongside the other socially liberalising legislation of this period, notably the legalisation of homosexuality and abortion and the other permissive reforms. In doing so, it assesses the relationship between abolition and this wider liberalisation. The emerging liberalising ethos after the Second World War is an important context for understanding abolition. This thesis identifies the collective identities of the abolitionists and retentionists. It examines the abolitionistsâ and retentionistsâ cases separately, assessing
Wright, Thomas James
'A barbarous penalty which the community has no right to exact' : why capital punishment was abolished in Britain, 1947-69. This thesis examines why capital punishment was abolished in Britain in spite of the consistent retentionism of the majority of the electorate. It addresses the period between 1947, when abolition was debated as part of the Criminal Justice Bill, and 1969, when capital punishment was abolished permanently for murder. In explaining why capital punishment was abolished, this thesis engages primarily with two broad historiographical narratives for the period: public opinion and liberalisation. It investigates how politicians used public opinion within their arguments and why the electorateâs retentionism did not convince a sufficient number of them to oppose abolition. It places abolition alongside the other socially liberalising legislation of this period, notably the legalisation of homosexuality and abortion and the other permissive reforms. In doing so, it assesses the relationship between abolition and this wider liberalisation. The emerging liberalising ethos after the Second World War is an important context for understanding abolition. This thesis identifies the collective identities of the abolitionists and retentionists. It examines the abolitionistsâ and retentionistsâ cases separately, assessing
barbarous penalty community right exact capital punishment abolish britain examines capital punishment abolish britain spite consistent majority electorate address period abolition debate part criminal_justice bill capital punishment abolish permanently murder explain capital punishment abolish engage primarily two_broad historiographical narrative period public_opinion investigates politician use public_opinion within argument electorate convince sufficient number oppose abolition place abolition alongside socially legislation period notably abortion reform assess relationship abolition wider emerge ethos second_world_war important context abolition identifies collective_identity examines abolitionist case separately assess