The distinct wrong of sexual attacks
Sexual violence is morally abhorrent and occurs with appalling frequency. In this thesis, I argue that we are correct to recognise sexual violence as seriously wrongful. Specifically, I argue that sexual attacks perpetrate a wrong that is not present in non-sexual attacks. This thesis begins by raising a problem for widely held views in sexual ethics. In order to explain why sexual attacks perpetrate a distinct wrong in virtue of being sexual attacks, it seems that we are committed to the view that there is something morally special about sexual contact. The worry is that this might presuppose or entail conservative or restrictive approaches to sexual ethics and/or a traditional and misogynist view of women and women's sexuality. I formulate this problem as the traditionalist's challenge. My focus in this thesis is on responding to this challenge, explaining the distinct wrongness of sexual attacks without appeal to a traditional or overly moralised approach to sexual contact. I discuss a range of accounts of the wrongness of sexual attacks. These explain the wrongness of sexual attacks by appeal to the victim's psychological suffering, the assailant's objectification of the victim, the importance of sex to
Morgan, Robert
The distinct wrong of sexual attacks. Sexual violence is morally abhorrent and occurs with appalling frequency. In this thesis, I argue that we are correct to recognise sexual violence as seriously wrongful. Specifically, I argue that sexual attacks perpetrate a wrong that is not present in non-sexual attacks. This thesis begins by raising a problem for widely held views in sexual ethics. In order to explain why sexual attacks perpetrate a distinct wrong in virtue of being sexual attacks, it seems that we are committed to the view that there is something morally special about sexual contact. The worry is that this might presuppose or entail conservative or restrictive approaches to sexual ethics and/or a traditional and misogynist view of women and women's sexuality. I formulate this problem as the traditionalist's challenge. My focus in this thesis is on responding to this challenge, explaining the distinct wrongness of sexual attacks without appeal to a traditional or overly moralised approach to sexual contact. I discuss a range of accounts of the wrongness of sexual attacks. These explain the wrongness of sexual attacks by appeal to the victim's psychological suffering, the assailant's objectification of the victim, the importance of sex to
distinct wrong sexual attack sexual_violence morally occurs frequency argue correct recognise sexual_violence seriously wrongful specifically_argue sexual attack wrong present non sexual attack begin raise_problem widely_hold view sexual ethic order_explain sexual attack distinct wrong virtue sexual attack seem committed view something morally special sexual contact worry might presuppose entail conservative restrictive approach sexual ethic and traditional view woman woman sexuality formulate problem traditionalist challenge focus respond challenge explain distinct sexual attack without appeal traditional overly sexual contact discus range account sexual attack explain sexual attack appeal victim psychological suffering objectification victim importance sex