The fundamental equation of nature : Spinoza's theory of parallelism revisited
In this dissertation, I re-interpret Spinoza's parallelism theory in the Ethics according to an original ontological, dualistic and idealistic perspective. The main thesis I put forward is that parallelism, and the dualism it harbours, is the only possible mediation between Spinoza's monism and his pluralism, i.e. between the unique substance and the 'infinite things in infinite modes' that follow from it. Second, I argue that the theory of parallelism is both coherent and unitary and no fracture should be viewed between Proposition 7 of Part II of the Ethics and its following Scholium. This interpretative strategy is original as it takes a route that is generally neglected by Spinoza scholarship, and thus is in contrast to those interpretations that see an unsurmountable contradiction in Spinoza's parallelism or that distinguish an ontological variant from an epistemological variant of it. Moreover, my interpretation of parallelism originally clarifies some obscure passages in later parts of the Ethics, such as the Spanish poet anecdote and the eternal mind doctrine. My interpretation is the result of a full-fledged idealistic interpretation that is based on the pronounced pre-eminence of the attribute of
Monaco, Davide
Dualism ; Metaphysics
The fundamental equation of nature : Spinoza's theory of parallelism revisited. In this dissertation, I re-interpret Spinoza's parallelism theory in the Ethics according to an original ontological, dualistic and idealistic perspective. The main thesis I put forward is that parallelism, and the dualism it harbours, is the only possible mediation between Spinoza's monism and his pluralism, i.e. between the unique substance and the 'infinite things in infinite modes' that follow from it. Second, I argue that the theory of parallelism is both coherent and unitary and no fracture should be viewed between Proposition 7 of Part II of the Ethics and its following Scholium. This interpretative strategy is original as it takes a route that is generally neglected by Spinoza scholarship, and thus is in contrast to those interpretations that see an unsurmountable contradiction in Spinoza's parallelism or that distinguish an ontological variant from an epistemological variant of it. Moreover, my interpretation of parallelism originally clarifies some obscure passages in later parts of the Ethics, such as the Spanish poet anecdote and the eternal mind doctrine. My interpretation is the result of a full-fledged idealistic interpretation that is based on the pronounced pre-eminence of the attribute of
fundamental equation nature spinoza theory parallelism revisit interpret spinoza parallelism theory ethics accord original ontological dualistic idealistic perspective main put_forward parallelism dualism harbour possible mediation spinoza monism pluralism unique substance infinite thing infinite mode follow second_argue theory parallelism coherent unitary fracture view proposition part ethics follow interpretative_strategy original take route generally neglect spinoza scholarship thus contrast interpretation see contradiction spinoza parallelism distinguish ontological variant epistemological variant moreover interpretation parallelism originally clarify obscure passage later part ethics spanish poet anecdote eternal mind doctrine interpretation full fledged idealistic interpretation base pronounce pre eminence attribute