Being art - a study in ontology
I present and defend a two-category ontology of art. The basic idea of it is that singular artworks are physical objects, whereas multiple artworks are types of which there can be tokens in the form of performances, copies, or other kinds of realisations. I argue that multiple artworks, despite being abstract objects, have a temporal extension, thus they are created at a certain point of time and can also drop out of existence again under certain conditions. They can, however, not be perceived by the senses and cannot enter into causal relations. The identity of an artwork is determined by its structural properties, but also by the context in which it was made. The essential contextual properties of an artwork are those that are relevant to the meaning of the work. A realisation of a multiple artwork has to comply with the structure of the work and has to stand in the correct intentional and/or causal-historical relation to the work. Realisations that diverge too much from the structure of the work, like translations of literary works, are what I call âderivative artworksâ. I argue against the thesis that all artworks are multiple. I claim that there are singular artworks, and some of them are even necessarily
Weh, Michael
Philosophy ; Aesthetics ; BH39.W45 ; Art--Philosophy ; Ontology
Being art - a study in ontology. I present and defend a two-category ontology of art. The basic idea of it is that singular artworks are physical objects, whereas multiple artworks are types of which there can be tokens in the form of performances, copies, or other kinds of realisations. I argue that multiple artworks, despite being abstract objects, have a temporal extension, thus they are created at a certain point of time and can also drop out of existence again under certain conditions. They can, however, not be perceived by the senses and cannot enter into causal relations. The identity of an artwork is determined by its structural properties, but also by the context in which it was made. The essential contextual properties of an artwork are those that are relevant to the meaning of the work. A realisation of a multiple artwork has to comply with the structure of the work and has to stand in the correct intentional and/or causal-historical relation to the work. Realisations that diverge too much from the structure of the work, like translations of literary works, are what I call âderivative artworksâ. I argue against the thesis that all artworks are multiple. I claim that there are singular artworks, and some of them are even necessarily
art study ontology present defend category ontology art basic idea singular artwork physical_object whereas multiple artwork type_token form performance copy kind realisation argue multiple artwork despite abstract object temporal extension thus create certain point_time also drop existence certain_condition however perceive sens enter causal relation identity artwork determine structural_property also context make essential contextual property artwork relevant meaning work realisation multiple artwork comply structure work stand correct intentional and causal historical relation work diverge much structure work like translation literary_work call derivative artwork argue artwork multiple claim singular artwork even necessarily