The gender of ethics : sexual and moral identity in Rousseau, Freud, and Kierkegaard
This thesis argues that questions of ethical life, moral identity, and gender are inextricably involved, and that an appropriate conception of each is necessary for the thinking of the others. In particular it seeks to demonstrate that the way in which freedom is conceived in its relation to moral identity and ethical life has profound implications for the thought of gender relations. It is further argued that the writings of Kierkegaard open up a way of relating freedom and the finite that offers the possibility of re-thinking gender. The writings of Rousseau and of Freud are examined to show the interdependence of their philosophical anthropology and the systematic subordination and exclusion of women that operates in each of them. In each case it is shown that, despite the very different, and even opposed ways that they construe the nature of moral identity and its relation to ethical life, a parallel gender polarity is at work. In Rousseau male moral identity rests on independence from society and infinite, excessive freedom. This is brought into relation to the mundane world of ethical life through gender. Women are denied independence and moral identity and made responsible for social being. Their subordination
Brindley, Nicholas
B Philosophy (General) ; HM Sociology ; HQ The family. Marriage. Woman
The gender of ethics : sexual and moral identity in Rousseau, Freud, and Kierkegaard. This thesis argues that questions of ethical life, moral identity, and gender are inextricably involved, and that an appropriate conception of each is necessary for the thinking of the others. In particular it seeks to demonstrate that the way in which freedom is conceived in its relation to moral identity and ethical life has profound implications for the thought of gender relations. It is further argued that the writings of Kierkegaard open up a way of relating freedom and the finite that offers the possibility of re-thinking gender. The writings of Rousseau and of Freud are examined to show the interdependence of their philosophical anthropology and the systematic subordination and exclusion of women that operates in each of them. In each case it is shown that, despite the very different, and even opposed ways that they construe the nature of moral identity and its relation to ethical life, a parallel gender polarity is at work. In Rousseau male moral identity rests on independence from society and infinite, excessive freedom. This is brought into relation to the mundane world of ethical life through gender. Women are denied independence and moral identity and made responsible for social being. Their subordination
gender ethic sexual moral identity rousseau freud kierkegaard argues question ethical_life moral identity gender inextricably involve appropriate conception necessary thinking others particular seek way freedom conceive relation moral identity ethical_life profound implication think gender_relation argue writing kierkegaard open way relate freedom finite offer possibility re_thinking gender writing rousseau freud examine show interdependence philosophical anthropology systematic subordination exclusion woman operate them case show despite different even oppose way construe nature_moral identity relation ethical_life parallel gender polarity work rousseau male moral identity rest independence society infinite excessive freedom bring relation mundane world ethical_life gender women deny independence moral identity make responsible social subordination