The validity of theology as an academic discipline : a study in the light of the history and philosophy of science and with special reference to relevant aspects of the thought of Austin Farrer
An analysis of relevant aspects of the history of science shows that theology's loss of credibility in an increasingly science-oriented age can be attributed to unresolved disputes from the past over metaphysical, epistemological and methodological issues. In Chapters 1 and 2, an attempt is made to show that the basic disagreements between science and theology can be traced to the ongoing quest for the principles of knowing shared by all disciplines. In Chapters 3 to 6, an attempt is made to identify these principles. Firstly, the processes and principles by which science acquires its knowledge and deems it to be objective are examined. Secondly it is argued that these same processes and principles are not the special property of science but are used by the humanities as well. Thirdly, it is contended that these principles are ~empirico-critical.~ They enable us to bridge the gap between thought and reality and gain access to knowledge of the external world. A more comprehensive model for knowing is proposed. Chapters 7 to 9 examine whether it is possible to apply empirico-critical principles to theology. From a study of relevant aspects of Austin Farrer's thought, it is argued (i) that the processes of knowing
Yee, Margaret May
Theology ; Methodology
The validity of theology as an academic discipline : a study in the light of the history and philosophy of science and with special reference to relevant aspects of the thought of Austin Farrer. An analysis of relevant aspects of the history of science shows that theology's loss of credibility in an increasingly science-oriented age can be attributed to unresolved disputes from the past over metaphysical, epistemological and methodological issues. In Chapters 1 and 2, an attempt is made to show that the basic disagreements between science and theology can be traced to the ongoing quest for the principles of knowing shared by all disciplines. In Chapters 3 to 6, an attempt is made to identify these principles. Firstly, the processes and principles by which science acquires its knowledge and deems it to be objective are examined. Secondly it is argued that these same processes and principles are not the special property of science but are used by the humanities as well. Thirdly, it is contended that these principles are ~empirico-critical.~ They enable us to bridge the gap between thought and reality and gain access to knowledge of the external world. A more comprehensive model for knowing is proposed. Chapters 7 to 9 examine whether it is possible to apply empirico-critical principles to theology. From a study of relevant aspects of Austin Farrer's thought, it is argued (i) that the processes of knowing
validity theology academic_discipline study light history_philosophy science special_reference relevant_aspect think analysis relevant_aspect history_science show theology loss credibility increasingly science oriented age attribute unresolved dispute past metaphysical epistemological methodological_issue attempt_make show_basic disagreement science theology trace ongoing quest principle know share discipline attempt_make identify principle firstly process principle science acquire_knowledge objective examine secondly_argue process principle special property science use humanity well thirdly contend principle critical enable bridge_gap thought reality gain_access knowledge external_world comprehensive model know propose examine_whether possible apply critical principle theology study relevant_aspect think argue process know